Every session becomes part of a living matter file.
Follow Sarah, a family-law mediator, through a multi-session case. Facts, commitments, and contradictions surface across sessions.
Sarah takes on a new mediation.
Sarah, a family-law mediator, opens a new matter: Smith v. Smith. The intake call with both parties and their counsel lands on the timeline as event one.
Branches fan out.
Analytical branches run: session summary, positions by party, points conceded, new facts introduced, procedural notes. Each is a reference artifact, not yet part of the matter file.
The matter file proposes itself.
Sarah reviews the AI's proposed Matter File — parties, key facts, filings to date, deadlines, open threads. She edits two fact entries, adjusts a deadline, applies. The canvas is now v1.
A filing lands. A persistent branch tracks commitments.
Before session two, opposing counsel files a financial affidavit. The PDF joins the matter's timeline, extracted into structured facts. After the session, Sarah pins a Commitments log — a persistent branch that watches every session and filing, separating written commitments from verbal ones. Its own parallel canvas starts filling.
A contradiction surfaces.
Session four. The Commitments log spots an inconsistency: petitioner cited "Option B" verbally today, but "Option A" was filed in writing weeks ago. Its parallel canvas flags it. The main matter file doesn't — it shows only what Sarah has curated.
Sarah promotes a procedural change.
She opens the Commitments branch, sees the pattern, and merges a procedural decision into the matter: "agreed resolutions must be memorialised in writing within 48 hours." A deliberate gesture — the trunk now reflects what the parallel universe surfaced.
Transcribr is in early access
We're opening up to a small group first. Drop your email and we'll reach out when your spot is ready.
No spam. One email when your access is ready.