Sprint plans that evolve. Agents on the same timeline.
Follow Priya, an engineering manager, through a sprint. Standups feed the plan; agents execute against it.
Priya's team kicks off a sprint.
Priya, EM of a 6-person team, runs sprint planning. Transcribr joins. The kickoff lands on the project timeline as event one.
Branches fan out.
Analytical branches: sprint summary, action items per engineer, blockers raised, acceptance-criteria drafts. Reference material; doesn't touch the plan yet.
The plan proposes itself.
Priya reviews the AI's proposed Plan: milestones, epics, issues with acceptance criteria and dependencies. She tweaks two issue titles, adds an owner, applies. v1 of the sprint plan.
An architecture doc lands. A persistent branch watches for patterns.
Between standups, the infra team shares an architecture proposal PDF — it joins the project as context for the webhook-hardening epic. Five standups in, Priya pins a Recurring blockers branch: it accumulates a parallel canvas across standups, grouping blockers by root cause.
Send an issue to Claude Code.
Issue #3 is ready for execution. Priya clicks send to Claude Code. The agent becomes another branch on the timeline — started, read repo, opened PR — and lands an agent.action event.
Merge the pattern into a retro decision.
The Recurring blockers branch shows three patterns driving 60% of slipped issues. Priya merges a retro-action into the plan: "introduce blocker-first standups for next sprint."
Transcribr is in early access
We're opening up to a small group first. Drop your email and we'll reach out when your spot is ready.
No spam. One email when your access is ready.